tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6385085882160667044.post4909012183795755925..comments2010-01-12T13:17:58.398ZThe Monsterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15291546809967159683monster@e3gazette.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6385085882160667044.post-4884393738312155932008-09-09T18:22:37.922Z2008-09-09T18:22:37.922ZActually, it makes Hell-a-sense.<BR/><BR/>In fact, as I mull the whole thing over, it's the ONLY scenario that accounts for the pregnancy/birth itself AND the reactions of...well.. everyone involved, right down to the aid's wife.<BR/><BR/>Monster, I tip my hat to you - I think you've got it.<BR/><BR/> - MuscleDaddyMuscleDaddyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17719637531761541940noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6385085882160667044.post-56304903313132433782008-08-27T02:01:57.099Z2008-08-27T02:01:57.099ZYour theory is certainly possible, but not likely in this particular cse.<BR/><BR/>First of all, there are certain people with genetic constitutions that are able to conceive at the relatively advanced age of 43 (which is the age Hunter was when she became pregnant). <BR/><BR/>I would imagine that the age of 43 or 44 is not all that rare in countries with high birth rates such as India. <BR/><BR/>My grandmother, who was Hungarian, had her last child at 46, and this is a fact, not an estimation. My grandmother's age was not guessed at; I have her birth certificate to prove it.<BR/><BR/>Also, a friend of mine just gave birth naturally to her fifth child (a complete accident) last year at age 46. <BR/><BR/>So please don't be so sure of your theory -- which is all it is, really - because, really, it doesn't make much sense.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6385085882160667044.post-2264151892797940652008-08-24T08:41:23.698Z2008-08-24T08:41:23.698ZPapayasf, Edward's main constituency is southern, Christian and progressive. Christians have a long history of forgiving adulterers - like Clinton, Jimmy Swaggart. That's why he was so clear that he was cheating on his wife BEFORE her cancer returned - after she was diagnosed, cheating on her was unforgivable.<BR/><BR/>That's also the reason he's so strongly denying that it's his baby. If she got pregnant the old fashioned way it was 6 weeks after the diagnosis. Like, he was doing her while his wife was in chemo. If THAT ever gets traction, he's toast.<BR/><BR/>Nobody knows how that group of Christians would react to his having donor egg/sperm kids. I'd hope they wouldn't care, but they can be very judgmental. So they may be seeing how this plays out. If it doesn't, they can switch to the surrogate story. <BR/><BR/>Othewise, why would Elizabeth still be supporting him?Richardhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14789864340695137943noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6385085882160667044.post-15528372210212391952008-08-23T03:30:36.104Z2008-08-23T03:30:36.104ZNo one would hire a 40ish surrogate with no kids. Nice try.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6385085882160667044.post-8495774764050765012008-08-22T11:17:28.921Z2008-08-22T11:17:28.921ZHare brained not hair-brainedAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6385085882160667044.post-3429009879521265292008-08-21T23:38:19.193Z2008-08-21T23:38:19.193ZEdwards would probably prefer aides to aids.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6385085882160667044.post-30754785386244851862008-08-21T20:06:59.966Z2008-08-21T20:06:59.966ZWell, it's a new angle, but there are a few problems with it. The big one is: How is it better for Edwards to say Rielle was an affair instead of a surrogate mother?<BR/><BR/>Also, given the length of the affair, it's not at all unreasonable to think Rielle might have gotten pregnant the old-fashioned way. If you play 1 to 40 odds several times a week for months, chances are you'll hit the jackpot. And who's to say she wasn't getting some fertility help on the side?PapayaSFnoreply@blogger.com